Subject: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Social Entrepreneurship Funds.
Ref.: COM(2011) 862 final – 2011/0418 (COD)
Download file.doc (51 KB)
- Procedure
| Council referral: | 20 January 2012 | |
| European Parliament referral: | ||
| Legal basis: | Article 114 of the TFEU | |
| Committee Bureau decision: | 17 January 2012 | |
| Section responsible: | Single Market, Production and Consumption | |
| Section president: | Mr Cassidy (UK-I) | |
| Organisation of section work: | 1 February 2012 | |
| Study Group on | President: | Ms Rondinelli (IT-II) |
| European Social Entrepreneurship Funds | Rapporteur: | Ms Rodert (SE-III) |
| Members: | Mr Cabra de Luna (ES-III) Mr Farrugia (MT-I) Mr Guerini (IT-III) Mr Manoliu (RO-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Varfalvi) Mr Mitov (BG-II) Mr Polyzogopoulos (EL-II) Ms Sharma (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Burns) |
To the members of the
European Economic and Social Committee
Expert
Mr Hahn (for the rapporteur)
- Gist of the Commission document
The proposed regulation presented by the Commission lays the foundations for a strong European market for social investment funds.
While they often receive public support, specialised social investment funds are still rare or not large enough. Moreover, cross-border investment in such funds is unnecessarily complicated and expensive.
There are five key elements to the Commission proposal.
- A recognised EU brand for social entrepreneurship funds: Currently, investors can find it difficult to identify funds that are investing in social businesses and this can undermine trust in the social business market.
- Improved investor information: Just as investors can find it difficult to identify funds investing in social businesses, the information available about these funds and what they are doing can be difficult to compare and use. Setting a common EU framework for this information is therefore vital.
- Better performance measures: The projected impact is an important factor for investors in choosing between various social investment funds. The proposed measures will set out clear requirements for funds to inform investors on how they will go about monitoring and reporting on impacts.
- Break down barriers to fundraising across Europe: Rules targeting social investment funds differ per Member State and are often onerous and complex. For this reason, the new proposals will simplify rules. For example, a European passport would ensure that social entrepreneurship funds could raise funds across Europe.
- Availability to investors: Because investing in social businesses can be risky, the “European Social Entrepreneurship Funds” label would initially only be available to professional investors. Once the framework is up and running, the Commission will examine possible measures to make such investments also available to retail customers.
- Draft timetable
| DATE | MEETING | DOCUMENT |
| 21 March 2012 | First study group | Commission document, working document |
| 17 April 2012 | Section | Draft opinion |
| 23-24 May 2012 | Plenary session | Section opinion |
ZAP
March 7, 2024Zaproxy dolore alias impedit expedita quisquam.